13 August 1996
Supreme Court
Download

SURAT SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS. ETC Vs UNION OF INDIA

Bench: RAMASWAMY,K.
Case number: Appeal (civil) 4028 of 1988


1

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 2  

PETITIONER: SURAT SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS. ETC

       Vs.

RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA

DATE OF JUDGMENT:       13/08/1996

BENCH: RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH: RAMASWAMY, K. MAJMUDAR S.B. (J)

CITATION:  1996 SCALE  (6)230

ACT:

HEADNOTE:

JUDGMENT:                             WITH                  CIVIL APPEAL NO.84 OF 1986 Malli & Ors. V. Union of India                          O R D E R      This case  relates to  the  notification  issued  under Section 4(1)  of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 published on October 24,  1961. The Land Acquisition Officer in his award dated  December   16,  1964   granted  compensation  at  the Rs.2,000/- per  bigha. On reference, the Additional District Judge by  his award  and decree  dated May 20, 1970 enhanced the compensation  varying between  Rs.2,000/- to  Rs.3,000/- per bigha  in respect  of ABC  Blocks. The High Court in the impugned judgment  dated September  11,  1984  enhanced  the compensation to  the uniform  rate of  Rs.7,000/- per Bigha. Dissatisfied  therewith,  the  claimants  have  filed  these appeals.      Though there is some force in the contention of learned senior counsel for the appellants that there is a difference between  the   earlier  cases   and  this  case,  since  the notification in  the earlier  cases dated  back to  1959 and this notification  to 1961,  the sale  instances relating to the small  pieces of  land cannot be solely relied upon when lands of  an extent  of  around  16000  and  odd  bighas  is acquired. There  is no  proof of  these  sale  transactions. Moreover, even if they were true, 1/3rd of the value towards development charges  has to  be deducted.  This exercise was not done.  Even if  it is  done, the appellant will get less then what  was  awarded  by  the  High  Court.  Under  these circumstances, we  are not  inclined to  interfere with  the judgment and  order made  by the  High Court since the State did not file any appeal.      The appeals are accordingly dismissed. No costs.

2

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 2