STATE OF KERALA Vs D. GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI .
Bench: ARIJIT PASAYAT,MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, , ,
Case number: C.A. No.-005907-005907 / 2008
Diary number: 26242 / 2005
Advocates: G. PRAKASH Vs
P. K. MANOHAR
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.5907 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 26243 of 2005)
State of kerala & Anr. …..Appellants
Versus
Prof. D. Gopalakrishna Pillai & Ors. ...Respondents
(With Civil Appeal No.5908 of 2008 @ SLP (C) No.6257/2007)
J U D G M E N T
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. Challenge in these appeals is to the judgment of a
Division Bench of the Kerala High Court dismissing the appeal
filed by the State. Before the High Court it was contended
that the decision of the full Bench of the High Court in
Accountant General v. Kunjamma [2003 (3) KLT 345] relied on
by learned Single Judge was in appeal before this Court and
an order of stay of the said Court had been passed. But, the
High Court was of the view that in view of the decision of the
Full Bench the writ appeal was without merit.
3. It is submitted that the High Court’s judgment is dated
19.7.2005, while the identical issue came up for consideration
in State of Kerala v. P.V. Neelakandan [2005(5) SCC 561],
which was decided on 11.7.2005.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the
view expressed in C.A. No. 2907 of 2005 decided on 22.2.2001
has also relevance.
2
5. We are of the view that the case at hand needs to be
decided in line with what has been stated in P.V.
Neelakandan’s case (supra) and in C.A. 2907 of 2005. We,
therefore, remit the matter to the High Court to hear the
matter afresh and decide the writ appeal in the light of what
has been stated by this Court in the aforesaid two decisions.
6. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
…………..…………………..…..J. (Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT)
……………………..…………….J. (Dr. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA)
New Delhi, September 30, 2008
3