STATE OF GUJARAT Vs ALOK PRATAP SINGH .
Case number: C.A. No.-001136-001136 / 2010
Diary number: 672 / 2009
Advocates: Vs
SHIRAZ CONTRACTOR PATODIA
1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1136 OF 2010 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(C)NO.3665 OF 2010 @ CC NO.292)
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ... APPELLANTS(S)
VERSUS
ALOK PRATAP SINGH & ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S)
WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1137 OF 2010 @ SLP(C)NO.21936/2008
O R D E R
Permission to file SLP granted.
Leave granted. The State of Gujarat has challenged the order(s) passed by
the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in these appeals. About 315 M.T.s
of waste lying at Union Carbide India Ltd. factory at Bhopal was
sought to be incinerated at BEIL, Ankleshwar in Gujarat. The Madhya
Pradesh State Pollution Control Board sought a direction from the
High Court of M.P. to incinerate the waste at Ankleshwar in Gujarat.
This was objected to by the State of Gujarat.
Notices were issued to the respondents. After series of
deliberations with the counsel on either sides/parties and in view
of the dispute between the two States on 19.01.2009, this Court
requested the Union of India (Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers)
to constitute/have a High Level meeting/committee to discuss with
the representatives of the States of Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh and
to find out some reasonable solution for the disputes. It was
also indicated that the Committee so constituted may also take the
advise of the Central Pollution Control Board and the State
2
Pollution Control Boards in arriving at an appropriate decision.
The task force which was constituted pursuant to the directions of
this Court had held a meeting on 05.01.2010 and took certain
decisions and a copy of the Minutes of the Meeting so held by the
task force has been produced before this Court and it is also to be
noticed therein that the Principal Secretary, Housing and
Environment Department, Govt. of M.P., briefed the task force on the
status of operationalization of incinerator at TSDF, Pithampur and
the facility was to be ready by November, 2009 but it has been
delayed and under Section 5 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986
given directions to the operator of the incinerator at TSDF
Pithampur for installation of Multi Effect Evaporator which involves
both cost and further delay; the Chairman of the Task Force had
requested the Senior Scientist of CPCB for his comments and it was
agreed that a conditional clearance would be given by CPCB for the
trial run and stabilization of incinerator at TSDF, Pithampur and
the whole process would be completed within a time bound schedule.
Learned counsel appearing for the State of Madhya Pradesh
submitted that necessary approval regarding the same would be
processed and granted by the appropriate authorities, including the
Director of Health and Safety, Indore, the Forest Department of the
State Government and a joint inspection by CPCB and the State
Pollution Control Board would be conducted. After the completion of
the above task, the trial run permission will be given after the
stabilization work is over and the trial run will be conducted with
other industrial waste. We record the same and we request the
3
appropriate authorities to comply with the above directions and the
appeals are accordingly allowed. No costs.
CPCB has also given the modified directions, which are
also to be complied with by the appropriate authorities.
..................CJI (K.G. BALAKRISHNAN)
...................J. (J.M.PANCHAL)
...................J. (Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN)
NEW DELHI; 28TH JANUARY, 2010