SHAILENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAY Vs STATE OF U.P.
Case number: Crl.A. No.-000973-000973 / 2009
Diary number: 23361 / 2008
Advocates: Vs
ANUVRAT SHARMA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 973 OF 2009
(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 6806/2008)
Shailendra Kumr Upadhyay .. Appellant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. .. Respondent(s) O R D E R
Leave granted.
This appeal is directed against order dated 30th October, 2007 passed by the
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail
Application No. 20447 of 2007. By the impugned order, second application filed by
the appellant for grant of bail has been dismissed.
We have heard learned counsel for the parties.
The appellant is facing trial for offence punishable under Sections
420/419,467/408/218,409 I.P.C. He was arrested on 4th May, 2006. While rejecting
the bail application, taking note of the fact that the appellant was in jail for the last
one and half years, the High Court has directed the Trial Court to complete the trial
within a period of three months. As noted earlier, the said direction was issued by
the High Court as far back as on 30th October, 2007. Admittedly, the trial has not
yet been concluded. In
: 2 :
fact on a pointed query by us, learned counsel for the State is not in a position to
answer as to how many witnesses have already been examined and how many still
remain to be examined.
Having regard to all these facts, we are of the opinion, that it is a fit case
where the benefit of regular bail should be granted to the appellant till the completion
of the trial. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed; impugned order is set aside and it is
directed that the appellant shall be admitted to bail on his furnishing personal bond
in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with two sound sureties in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the trial Court.
...................J. [ D.K. JAIN ]
...................J. [ R.M. LODHA ]
NEW DELHI, MAY 08, 2009.