RAMJI JIRANGA PAWAR Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case number: Crl.A. No.-000877-000877 / 2008
Diary number: 24586 / 2007
Advocates: NARESH KUMAR Vs
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.877 OF 2008 [ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRIMINAL) NO.6416 OF 2007]
RAMJI JIRANGA PAWAR & ORS. Appellants
VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. In this appeal the trail Court by its judgment dated 30.3.2005 convicted
appellant No.1 (Ramji Jiranga Pawar) for the offence punishable under Section 324
of the Indian Penal Code (in short "IPC") and sentenced him to suffer rigorous
imprisonment for three years with fine of Rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine
to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months. The trial court also convicted
appellant No.2 (Parbatsingh Jiranga Pawar) and appellant No.3 (Dwarka Bhusalya
Pawar) for the offence punishable under Section 323 IPC and sentenced them to
suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year with fine of Rs.1000/- and in default of
payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month.
3. On appeal, the High Court by its judgment dated 11th April, 2007
confirmed the conviction and sentence awarded to the appellants by the trial court.
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 2
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having carefully
gone through the evidence placed on record, in our view, the ends of justice will be
sub-served if the sentence awarded to appellant No.1 is reduced from 3 years R.I. to
1= years R.I. and the sentence of appellant Nos. 2 & 3, who are stated to have
already undergone almost 7 months R.I., is reduced to the period already undergone
by them. We order accordingly. Appellant Nos. 2 and 3 shall be released forthwith,
if not required in any other case.
5. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly.
.....................J. (P.P. Naolekar)
.....................J. (V.S. Sirpurkar) New Delhi; May 13, 2008.