P. KRISHNAVENI Vs TATA VENKATA KRISHNA RAO
Bench: DALVEER BHANDARI,DEEPAK VERMA, , ,
Case number: Crl.A. No.-001808-001808 / 2010
Diary number: 15555 / 2008
Advocates: V. N. RAGHUPATHY Vs
K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1808 OF 2010 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.)No.4488 of 2008)
P. KRISHNAVENI ... APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
TATA VENKATA KRISHNA RAO & ANR. ... RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that
respondent-Tata Venkata Krishna Rao has received Rs.1.08 lacs
from the appellant and he does not want to prosecute the
complaint filed by him under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act being C.C.No.444 of 2002, pending on the file
of the II Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class,
Machilipatnam.
In view of the statement of learned counsel for the
respondent and the fact that the entire amount has been paid,
we deem it appropriate to quash the complaint C.C.No.444 of
2002, pending on the file of the II Additional Judicial
magistrate of I Class, Machilipatnam that has been filed under
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The impugned judgment is set aside and the appeal is,
accordingly, disposed of.
...................J. (DALVEER BHANDARI)
...................J. (DEEPAK VERMA)
NEW DELHI; 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2010