MEHUL MAHENDRA THAKKAR @ KARIA Vs MEENA MEHUL THAKKAR @ KARIA
Case number: C.A. No.-001788-001788 / 2009
Diary number: 33521 / 2007
Advocates: Vs
ABHA R. SHARMA
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.1788 OF 2009 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 22196 of 2007)
Mehul Mahendra Thakkar @ Karia ……….Appellant
Versus
Meena Mehul Thakkar @ Karia ……..Respondent
ORDER
Leave granted.
2) The order passed by the High Court of Bombay in Civil
Application No. 238 of 2007 filed in Family Court Appeal No.
128 of 2007 dated 5.10.2007 is the subject matter of this appeal.
3) By the impugned order, the court has directed the Court Receiver
to take possession of the flat from the appellant and induct
respondent-wife in the flat during the pendency of the appeal.
4) In the appeal filed, the appellant has called in question the
correctness or otherwise of the findings and the conclusion
reached by the Family Court in Petition No. A-1072/2000 dated
1
6.2.2007, wherein the Family Court has reached the conclusion
that both the husband and wife are joint owners of flat bearing No.
303, Rajesh Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Borivali
(West), Mumbai.
5) Even before giving a verdict on the findings and the conclusions
reached by the Family Court, by way of interim relief, the court
has granted the main relief itself. This, in our opinion is
unsustainable. It is settled legal position, that by way of interim
relief, final relief should not be granted till the matter is decided
one way or the other.
6) In view of the above, we allow this appeal and set aside the order
by the High Court in Family Court Appeal No. 128 of 2007 dated
5th day of October, 2007. In view of the peculiar facts and
circumstances of this case, we request the court to dispose of the
appeal as early as possible and at any rate within an outer limit of
six months from the date of receipt of copy of this court’s order.
…………………………………J. [ TARUN CHATTERJEE ]
…………………………………J. [ H.L. DATTU ]
2
New Delhi, March 23, 2009.
3