10 August 2009
Supreme Court
Download

KHURSHEED ANWAR KHAN Vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,DEORIA

Case number: C.A. No.-005271-005271 / 2009
Diary number: 13045 / 2006
Advocates: ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY Vs KAMLENDRA MISHRA


1

1

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

 CIVIL APPEAL NO.5271 OF 2009  (Arising out of SLP(C)No.9679 OF 2006)      

KHURSHEED ANWAR KHAN                               .....APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,DEORIA & ORS                   ....RESPONDENT(S)

O  R  D  E  R

Leave granted. The appellant was serving as an Arms Clerk.  After a departmental enquiry, he was  

dismissed from service w.e.f.20.09.2004.  Thereafter, he challenged the same by filing a Writ  

Petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.  By Order dt.10.03.2005,  though the  

learned  Single  Judge  referred  to  factual  details  about  the  enquiry  and  ultimate  dismissal,  

however, finally dismissed the Writ Petition on the ground of availability of alternative remedy  

of departmental appeal.   

The appellant, instead of resorting to the appeal remedy, filed a Special Appeal before  

the Division Bench of the High Court.  By the impugned order dt.06.04.2006, the Division Bench  

dismissed the  Special Appeal.  Challenging  the same, the appellant has filed the present appeal  

by way of Special Leave Petition.   

A reading of the impugned order of the Division Bench shows that after arguing his case  

for some time, the counsel for appellant sought permission to file an appeal in the department.  

However, the Division Bench turned down his request since the matter was argued for some  

time and ultimately dismissed his appeal.

   

It is not in dispute that as per Rule 11 of the U.P.Government Servant (Punishment and  

Appeal) Rules, 1999, the appellant is entitled to file an appeal before the appellate authority. No  

doubt, the appellant has not availed such remedy at the appropriate time.  Even after dismissal

2

2

of the Writ Petition by the learned Single Judge, he could have availed such remedy.  But the  

fact remains that though he wanted to avail such remedy at the appellate stage, the Division  

Bench has not permitted him to file the same.  Having note of the fact that the appellant has  

been dismissed from service, we are of the view that the appellant may be permitted to challenge  

the order of dismissal by resorting to  Rule 11 of the U.P.Government Servant (Punishment and  

Appeal) Rules, 1999 as mentioned above.   

The appellant is permitted to file an appeal to the Appellate Authority within a period of  

four weeks.  On such appeal being filed, the Appellate Authority is directed to consider and  

dispose of the same on merits in accordance with law.

We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

The appeal is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.    

                .............................J.                            ( P.SATHASIVAM )

                .............................J.                            ( R.M.LODHA )

NEW DELHI; AUGUST 10, 2009.