22 February 2008
Supreme Court
Download

JALAM SINGH Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Case number: Crl.A. No.-000368-000368 / 2008
Diary number: 18039 / 2007
Advocates: ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARY Vs C. D. SINGH


1

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1  

CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.)  368 of 2008

PETITIONER: Jalam Singh & Anr

RESPONDENT: State of Madhya Pradesh

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 22/02/2008

BENCH: C.K. THAKKER & D.K. JAIN

JUDGMENT: JUDGMENT O R D E R

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.  368 OF 2008  (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 6153/2007)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Delay condoned.

       Leave granted.

       We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

       Reading of the judgment of the High Court makes it clear that nobody appeared on  behalf of the appellants-accused (herein also appellants),  before the High Court and  the matter was proceeded and decided on merits. The High Court dismissed the  appeal.

       On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, in our opinion, it would be  appropriate if we set aside the order passed by the High Court and remit the matter to  the High Court for fresh disposal in accordance with law.  If the appellants are not  represented by the time the matter comes up for hearing, the High Court will appoint  Amicus Curiae and decide the case in accordance with law.   

       The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.  

..2/-

                           : 2 :

       We request the High Court to decide the matter as expeditiously as possible since th e  appellants are in jail.