DEORIA KASIA ZILA SAHKARI BANK LTD. Vs STATE OF U.P.
Bench: TARUN CHATTERJEE,AFTAB ALAM, , ,
Case number: C.A. No.-003460-003460 / 2006
Diary number: 27201 / 2004
Advocates: RAMESH CHANDRA MISHRA Vs
T. MAHIPAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL No.3460 OF 2006
DEORIA KASIA ZILA SAHKARI BANK LTD. .....APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. & ANR. ....RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In our view, this appeal is concluded by concurrent findings of fact of courts below. The
Labour Court and the High Court have come to a finding that respondent No.2 had completed
more than 240 days and, therefore, he could not be thrown out without following the provisions
under Section 6-N and 6-P of U.P.Industrial Disputes Act. We, therefore, do not find any ground
to interfere with the impugned order and the appeal is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
The appellant is directed to reinstate respondent No.2 within six weeks from the date of
communication of this order if not already done in the meantime.
We also make it clear that respondent No.2 shall not be entitled to any back wages.
.............................J. ( TARUN CHATTERJEE )
.............................J. ( AFTAB ALAM )
NEW DELHI; JULY 16, 2008.