17 July 2008
Supreme Court
Download

CHINTA DEVI Vs JANG BAHADUR SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS.

Bench: TARUN CHATTERJEE,AFTAB ALAM, , ,
Case number: C.A. No.-005945-005945 / 2000
Diary number: 10386 / 1998
Advocates: AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY Vs RR-EX-PARTE


1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA                CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

        CIVIL APPEAL NO.5945 OF 2000    

CHINTA DEVI & ORS.                                    .....APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

JANG BAHADUR SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. & ANR.              ....RESPONDENT(S)

             O  R  D  E  R

In spite of service of notice upon the respondents, no one has entered appearance on

behalf of the respondents.

We  have  heard  learned  counsel  for  the  appellants  and  perused  the  impugned

judgment dt.23.03.1998 in L.P.A.No.732 of 1996 passed by the High Court of Patna. The High Court

has given liberty to the appellants to approach the competent authority under Section 48 D of the

Bihar Tenency Act, 1885.  Such liberty being given by the High Court to the appellants, we do not

find any ground to interfere with the impugned order.  However, it will be open to the appellants to

apply before the competent authority under Section 48 D of the Bihar Tenency Act, 1885.  If such

an approach is made, the competent authority shall decide the same in accordance with law without

being influenced by the findings of the High Court and the appellate court.    

The appeal is disposed of accordingly.  There shall be no order as to costs.

                            .............................J.                    ( TARUN CHATTERJEE )

                  .............................J.                              ( AFTAB ALAM )

NEW DELHI; JULY 17, 2008.