05 February 2008
Supreme Court
Download

BABA JODHPURI @ JYOTI SWARUP ANAND Vs STATE OF UTTARANCHAL

Case number: Crl.A. No.-000268-000268 / 2008
Diary number: 15213 / 2006
Advocates: MUKESH K. GIRI Vs JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA


1

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 2  

CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.)  268 of 2008

PETITIONER: Baba Jodhpuri @ Jyoti Swarup Anand

RESPONDENT: State of Uttaranchal

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/02/2008

BENCH: C.K. THAKKER & ALTAMAS KABIR

JUDGMENT: JUDGMENT                              O R D E R (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl) No.3049/2006                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Leave granted.

       Heard learned counsel for the parties.         The appellant herein was convicted by the trial court for an offence  punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and was  ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years.

       Being aggrieved by the said order of conviction and sentence, the  appellant preferred an appeal and the High Court partly allowed the appeal  filed by him and converted conviction of the appellant from an offence  punishable under Section 307 IPC to Section 324 IPC and ordered to  undergo rigorous imprisonment for four months.

       Notice was issued by this Court to the State.  We have heard learned  counsel for the parties.

                       :2:         So far as conviction is concerned, in our opinion, it cannot be said that the  High Court has committed any error of law.  On the question of sentence, an  affidavit is filed by the appellant herein in which it was stated that the  appellant is aged about 92 years.  It was also stated as under:

       \023That I am suffering from Paralysis in the left part of my  body for about last three months.

       That in present day I am unable to walk and move from  my bed and I am strictly bed ridden.\024

       An affidavit on behalf of the respondent State is also filed wherein it was  stated that the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Pithoragarh, Uttarachal has  checked up and the information supplied by the appellant and the affidavit  filed by him are found to be correct.

2

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 2  

       The learned counsel for the appellant stated at the Bar that the appellant  has already undergone sentence for about five weeks.  In view of the totality of  the facts and circumstances of the case, in our  opinion, ends of justice would  be met if the sentence awarded to the appellant is reduced to the period  already undergone.    Ordered accordingly.

                               :3:

       The appeal is allowed to the extent above mentioned.  Since the appellant  is on bail the bail bonds of the appellant shall stand discharged.