26 February 2008
Supreme Court
Download

ARUN CHANDRA DAS MAZUMDAR Vs ABDUL NOOR BARBHUIYA(DEAD)BY LRS..

Case number: C.A. No.-002901-002901 / 2002
Diary number: 15283 / 2000
Advocates: SOMNATH MUKHERJEE Vs


1

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1  

CASE NO.: Appeal (civil)  2901 of 2002

PETITIONER: ARUN CHANDRA DAS MAZUMDAR

RESPONDENT: ABDUL NOOR BARBHUIYA (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/02/2008

BENCH: H.K. SEMA & MARKANDEY KATJU

JUDGMENT: JUDGMENT O R D E R

CIVIL APPEAL NO.2901 OF 2002

       This appeal is preferred by the defendant. Despite receipt of notice plaintiff- respondent did not appear.         The sole contention in this appeal is that the High Court in Second Appeal  interfered with the finding of fact recorded by the First Appellate Court without  framing a proper substantial question of law.         In paragraph 6 of the High Court order although it purported to have referred to  some substantial questions of law, what are those substantial questions of law which  have been framed are not disclosed. Instead, the High Court proceeded with the  disposal of the appeal without any framing substantial question of law. Only for this  reason the order of the High Court is set aside. The matter is remitted to the High  Court to hear the Second Appeal afresh after framing substantial question of law as  contemplated under Section  100 C.P.C.  If  there  is  no  substantial  question  of  law   

                       : 2 : involved the High Court may pass appropriate orders as it may deem fit and proper.  Second Appeal is restored to the file  of the High Court to dispose of in accordance  with law.         The appeal is allowed accordingly. No costs.