05 January 2009
Supreme Court
Download

STATE OF M.P. Vs SANJAY KERALKAR

Case number: C.A. No.-000006-000006 / 2009
Diary number: 1803 / 2007
Advocates: B. S. BANTHIA Vs B. SUNITA RAO


1

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 2  

                           IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA                              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                     CIVIL APPEAL No. 6        OF 2009          [Arising out of SLP(C)No.4855 of 2007]

STATE OF M.P.                                                      ...     Appellant(s)

          Versus

SANJAY KERALKAR                                                      ...   Respondent(s)

                                     ORDER

          Leave granted.

          Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties, we are unable to

   sustain the order passed by the Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court

   dismissing the appeal as preferred by the appellant herein on the ground that the

   appeal had been preferred against an order passed under Article 227 of the

   Constitution. We have had occasion to look into the petition which had been filed

   before the Single Bench of the High Court, which has been styled as writ petition

   under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. The Division Bench of the High

   Court appears to have not taken into consideration the fact that the petition had

   been styled as a writ petition under Article 226 as well and that the frame of the

   petition was that of a writ petition as would also be evident from the prayers made

   therein.

2

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 2  

            We are unable to agree with the High Court that the learned Single Judge

     had passed order under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and that the appeal

     was not maintainable.

            We, accordingly, allow the appeal and remit the matter to the High Court to

     treat the petition as one under Article 226 of the Constitution and to dispose of W.A.

     182   of 2006 in accordance with law, within two months from the date of

     communication of this order.

            There will be no order as to costs.

                                            ...................J.                               (ALTAMAS KABIR)

                                         ...................J.                                      (CYRIAC JOSEPH)

New Delhi, January 05, 2009.]