24 April 2009
Supreme Court
Download

RAJA RAM KASHYAP Vs STATE OF U.P.

Case number: Crl.A. No.-000864-000864 / 2009
Diary number: 12336 / 2008
Advocates: DINESH KUMAR GARG Vs ANUVRAT SHARMA


1

                                    REPORTABLE

       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL  APPEAL No. 864    OF 2009                    (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 3447  of 2008)     

      

RAJA RAM KASHYAP & ORS. ...   Appellant(s)                         Versus    STATE OF U.P. & ANR. ...  Respondent(s)

J U DG M E N T

Dr.ARIJIT PASAYAT,J.

Leave granted.

The only question raised is that since the parties have settled their dispute  

and want to compound the offence i.e Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code,  

1860 (in short the 'Act'), the court should have permit it to be in terms of sub-section  

(2) of Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'Code').  The  

offences indicated in the table are compoundable and it is indicated as to who is the  

person by whom the offence may be compounded.  

Sub-section 320 of the Code so far as relevant reads as follows:

The offence punishable under the sections of the Indian Penal Code (45 of  

1860) specified with the permission

-2-

2

of  the  Court  before  which  any  prosecution  for  such  offence  is  pending,  be  

compounded by the persons mentioned.

Offence   Section     Person by whom

     offencee may be                                                 compounded

Criminal breach of trust, where 406   The person to whom the value of the property hurt is caused does not exceed {Two hundred rupees)

Cheating and dishonestly inducing The owner of  delivery of property or the making,   420 the property. alteration or destruction of a valuable security

If the parties file necessary application for compounding in terms of the  

Section 320 of the Code, the concerned court will deal with the matter appropriately.  

The interim order passed by this court shall continue for a period of three months so  

that necessary steps can be taken.

The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

              ...................J.                                  (Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT)   

       

             ....................J.                          ((ASOK KUMAR GANGULY)

            

New Delhi, April 24, 2009.