27 February 1996
Supreme Court
Download

NAIN KAUR & ANR. Vs STATE OF J & K. & ORS.


1

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 2  

PETITIONER: NAIN KAUR & ANR.

       Vs.

RESPONDENT: STATE OF J & K. & ORS.

DATE OF JUDGMENT:       27/02/1996

BENCH: MUKHERJEE M.K. (J) BENCH: MUKHERJEE M.K. (J) MAJMUDAR S.B. (J)

CITATION:  1996 SCC  (3)  72        JT 1996 (4)    12  1996 SCALE  (2)SP79

ACT:

HEADNOTE:

JUDGMENT:                          O R D E R      This petition  under Article 32 of the Constitution  of India has  been filed  for a  writ requiring  production  of Dharamvir Singh,  a practising Advocate of Amritsar,  before this Court. The two petitioners are the mother and cousin of Dharamvir respectively. Their grievance is  that even though Dharamvir was  on bail  in connection with two cases earlier registered against  him and  was released from Central Jail, Jammu  on  May  12,1995  consequent  upon  quashing  of  his detention by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir, he was taken into custody as soon as he came out of the Jail by Sudarshan Singh, an  officer of  Pacca Danga  Police Station  of Jammu city and since then his whereabouts are not known.      Responding to  the notice  issued on  the petition, Mr. Pramod Jain,  Special Secretary  (Home), Government of Jammu and Kashmir  has filed  a counter  affidavit wherein  he has admitted that  Dharamvir Singh  was  released  from  Central Jail, Jammu  on  May  12,  1995.  In  detailing  Dharamvir’s subsequent movements,  Mr. Jain  has stated  that on May 21, 1995 a  Nakka was  laid he  area of  Kharkhola Post near the Indo-Pak Border  under the joint supervision of officials of Border Security  Force (BSF) and local Police Station Ranbir Singh Pura.  In course  of an  encounter  there  one  person sustained injured  and fell  down dead, while his associates escaped. From  the spot  one 0.38  mm pistol  with two  live rounds and  one nozzle  were recovered  . On  receipt of the report of  the above  death, an  entry was made in the daily diary of  Ranbir Singh Pura Police Station and investigation under Section  174 Cr.P.C.  taken  up.  In  course  of  that investigation photographs  of the  dead body were taken, but inspite of  best efforts  the identity of the deceased could not be  immediately established,  as nobody  came forward to claim the dead body. It was therefore handed over to Jammu & Kashmir Sewa Samiti for cremation after keeping the same for three days.  Mr. Jain has further stated that subsequently a

2

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 2  

few sikh gentlemen and a lady came to the police station and identified, on perusal of the photographs, clothes and other items seized  from the  person of  the deceased, that he was Dharamvir. Mr.  Jain  has  lastly  stated  that  during  the investigation it  was established  that Dharamvir was Killed it an  encounter with  BSF and  other members of Nakka party while entering  into India  from Pakistan. In support of his above statements  Mr. Jain has filed the statements recorded during the  investigation under Section 174 Cr.P.C. and some other documents.      Since the respondents were claiming that the person who allegedly died  in the  encounter was  Dharamvir, relying on the  identification  of  some  sikh  gentlemen  and  a  lady principally on  the basis  of the photograph of a dead body, we enquired  of the petitioners as to whether the photograph was that  of Dharamvir.  As petitioner  No. 1, the mother of Dharamvir, emphatically  stated it  was not  of her  son  we directed her  to produce  a photograph  of Dharamvir  with a supporting affidavit  which she complied with. To pursue the matter further  we tried  to requisition the services of Mr. R.L. Chadha,  an advocate of Jammu High Court, who according to the  petitioners was  present when  Dharamvir  Singh  was brought out of the Central Jail, Jammu and taken away by the officers of Pacca Danga Police Station. Mr. Chadha, however, did not respond to our request.      Since from  a comparison  of  the  photographs,  it  is difficult  for   us  to  disbelieve  the  assertion  of  the petitioner No.  1 that the dead body was not that of her son and,  for   that  matter,  to  accept  the  version  of  the respondent that Dharamvir died in an encounter we direct the Director of  Central Bureau  of Investigation  to  cause  an investigation made  into the  matter and  submit its  report within three months from today.      List thereafter.