K. NARAYANAN Vs STATE OF KERALA
Bench: K.G. BALAKRISHNAN,LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA,P. SATHASIVAM, ,
Case number: C.A. No.-004592-004592 / 2008
Diary number: 1782 / 2006
Advocates: Vs
P. V. DINESH
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4592 OF 2008 ( @ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 1819 OF 2006 )
K. Narayanan .... Appellant (s)
Versus
State of Kerala .... Respondent(s)
O R D E R
1) Leave granted.
2) The appellant herein has filed a representation before the State Government that
he was denied grade promotion on completion of 12 years and thereafter 20 years of
service. As the Government rejected his claim vide order dated 27.03.1992, the
appellant filed a writ petition before the High Court. The learned Single Judge of the
High Court, by judgment dated 07.11.1997, directed the authorities to consider the
application of the appellant and pass appropriate orders. As per the
direction of the High Court, the State
1
Government passed an order (Annexure-P4) which reads as follows:-
“In the circumstances explained above and in view of the observation contained in the judgment, Government is pleased to grant the benefit of higher grade to Shri K. Narayanan, Retd. HAS (Hindi), K.V.R. High School, Shoranur with effect from 01.07.1968 on completion of 12 years service and senior grade with effect from 01.07.1976 on completion of 20 years of service without back arrears and for the purpose of pensionary benefit only.”
3) Being aggrieved by the non-payment of back arrears, the appellant filed another
writ petition before the High Court. The learned Single Judge of the High Court was
pleased to dismiss the same and the Division Bench also declined to interfere with the
same as there was delay in making the claim.
4) Heard both sides.
5) The appellant is a retired Government servant and he has all along been seeking
for the difference in salary payable to him, consequent on his grade promotion which
was granted to him retrospectively and that too for a short period. The promotion was
denied to him not due to his fault and we do not think that the Government
was justified in denying the claim to the
2
appellant. In the circumstances, we set aside the judgment of the Single Judge and
Division Bench and direct that the Government may pass appropriate orders on the
appellant’s back arrears and settle the same at the earliest at least within a period of
three months.
6) We make it clear that no interest is payable to the appellant.
7) The appeal is allowed accordingly. No costs.
…….…….……………………CJI.
(K.G. BALAKRISHNAN)
.………………………………….J. (LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA)
...…………………………………J. (P. SATHASIVAM)
NEW DELHI; 21ST JULY, 2008.
3