A.P.STATE TRADING CORP.LTD. Vs M/S G.V.MALLA REDDY & CO.
Bench: R.V. RAVEENDRAN,H.L. GOKHALE, , ,
Case number: C.A. No.-008317-008318 / 2010
Diary number: 15055 / 2010
Advocates: Vs
M. VIJAYA BHASKAR
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8317-8318 OF 2010 [Arising out of SLP(C) No.16599-16600/2010
A.P. STATE TRADING CORPORATION LTD. .......APPELLANT
Versus
G.V. MALLA REDDY & CO. .....RESPONDENT
O R D E R
Mr. M. Vijaya Bhaskar, learned counsel
appears on caveat for the respondent. Leave granted.
Heard.
2. The arbitrator made an award dated 6.7.1991
allowing claims 1 to 8, 11 and 12 (Note: claims 1,2 and 5
were allowed only in part) and disallowing claims 9, 13 to
20 of the respondent. The arbitrator also granted interest
from 10.3.1989 to 6.1.1990 and from the date of award to
date of decree at 18% per annum. On the award being
challenged, the Civil Court, by judgment dated 19.2.2001
set aside the award on claims 5, 6 and 8. The Civil Court
limited the interest awarded (for the periods 10.3.1989 to
6.1.1990 and from date of awarded to date of decree) only
in regard to amounts awarded under claims 1 to 4 and 7 and
made the award a rule of the Court with further interest at
18% per annum from the date of decree to date of payment on
the amounts allowed under claims 1 to 4 and 7. Both
respondent
.....2.
- 2 -
and the appellant challenged the decision of the Civil
Court. The High Court, by impugned order dated 30.12.2009,
dismissed the appeal and revision filed by the appellant.
It allowed the appeal and revision filed by the respondent
in part and held that the respondent is entitled to
interest from the date of reference to date of award. In
other words, in view of the judgment of the High Court, the
interest is payable pendente lite and in future at 18% per
annum. The said judgment is challenged in these appeals by
special leave.
3. The award of the Arbitrator is governed by
the Arbitration Act, 1940. This court has been
consistently taking a view that in the absence of any
specific contract in regard to rate of interest, pendente
lite and future interest should not normally exceed 9% per
annum. [See State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. Ferro Concrete
Construction Pvt. Ltd., (2009) 12 SCC 1]
4. In view of the above, the appeals are allowed
in part and the interest awarded is reduced from 18% to 9%
per annum. In all other respects, the judgment of the
Civil Court as modified by the High Court is upheld.
......................J. ( R.V. RAVEENDRAN
)
New Delhi; .....................J. September 27, 2010. ( H.L. GOKHALE )